PhD Literature Review Secrets! Things you need to know about to save time and write an amazing chapter!
The journey of a PhD student is marked by numerous academic challenges, and one of the most formidable is undoubtedly the literature review. It's often the part that causes the most anxiety and stress. But fear not, because in this blog, I'll delve into the art of crafting an effective PhD literature review and guide you through the process.
The Ever-Evolving Nature of a PhD Literature Review
One of the first home truths about a PhD literature review is its perpetually evolving character. Unlike your previous academic experiences where you may have written a dissertation or thesis within a constrained timeline, a PhD literature review is an ongoing project. You'll be working on it throughout your entire doctoral journey.
At the outset of your research, your understanding of the topic is limited. As you dive deeper and gain insights, your literature review must adapt accordingly. So, don't be disheartened when it appears messy or incomplete—it's expected. In fact, the messiness is a sign of progress and exploration!
Quality Over Quantity
Some students may feel compelled to write up their literature review to boost their word count. This is a common mistake. It's crucial to understand that in the early stages, your focus should be on quality over quantity. Don't rush to generate voluminous text; instead, concentrate on the quality of your analysis and critical thinking.
Your literature review should reflect your deep understanding of the subject matter and your ability to critically evaluate existing research. As you gain more insights, you'll adjust and refine your review. Writing too much too soon can lead to unnecessary rewriting and wasted time.
Working with an Outline
During the initial phases, consider working with an outline rather than attempting to write a polished literature review. Create a structure with main headings and bullet points summarizing the literature relevant to each section. This approach offers flexibility and allows for easier revisions when new insights emerge.
Supervisor Feedback and Early Drafts
Your supervisor might request written drafts of your literature review, and that's a positive sign. They want to ensure you're meeting the required academic standards and can engage in critical analysis. Early drafts serve as samples of your work, giving them an opportunity to guide you on the right track. However, this doesn't mean you have to write up the entire review too soon. Focus on specific sections that require attention or clarification.
The Number of Headings
The number of headings in your literature review is a common concern. In the finished, polished version, aim for three to five main headings. However, during the early draft stages when your understanding is evolving, you can have more headings—sometimes as many as 10, 15, or even 20. These can later be condensed and organized as your review matures.
Conclusion
A PhD literature review can be messy, ever-changing, and filled with uncertainties. Embrace the journey; it's all part of the process. Quality, flexibility, and responsiveness to evolving insights are your allies. Focus on producing a well-crafted, thoughtful review rather than striving for sheer volume. And remember, your supervisor's input can be invaluable on your path to crafting an effective PhD literature review. Keep these tips in mind, and you'll find your way through the challenges of this critical part of your academic journey.
Need help with your PhD literature review?
Then check out my Complete Literature Review guide - details below!
